Gender, Identity, & Pop Culture
Thursday, November 22, 2018
Blog 3: My Example
The cultural artifact on which I'm reflecting is the Soloflex, one of the first home fitness products I saw advertised on television and in magazines. I was 15 years old when the Soloflex was created in 1978.
The first Soloflex advertisement I remember seeing as a teenage boy resonated with me because it reminded me of myself. A geeky-looking slender boy is posing in the mirror, wishing for a more muscular body. I was that boy. I was teased throughout middle and high school because I was a nerd -- the boy who ran the wrong way with the football, who was always picked last for teams in gym class, but who excelled in academics and choir. I was relentlessly bullied for being a "sissy." I was a straight A student from elementary school until my junior year of high school, when I received a B in swimming class because I was ashamed to take off my shirt and would often make up excuses for not participating. And so I created a fantasy in my mind: if I could build muscles, I could take off my shirt with pride, and all of the bullies would become envious of me. But I had no idea how to gain muscle. There were no gyms in my small Texas hometown, and I had no family or friends who knew anything about working out. My P.E. coaches were all out-of-shape ex-football players who sometimes joined the boys in teasing me. I decided that the Soloflex was my game changer.
I was in my twenties and had graduated from college before I could afford to buy a Soloflex. At this point, I had still never stepped foot into a gym. While the bullying stopped (for the most part) once I moved to Austin for college, I remained uncomfortable with my body. I no longer needed muscles to make the bullies envious; I needed them for my own self-confidence. I was now out of the closet as a gay man, and I found (and still find) the male gay/queer community very obsessed with bodies as a measure of one's worth. And so, in 1988, when I was 25 years old, I created my first gym in my apartment. I owned one piece of equipment -- my Soloflex. I hung pictures of the Soloflex model, Scott Madsen, in my apartment as motivation. Scott had the muscles I wanted, and he also perfectly fit the cultural standards of beauty for gay men in the 1980's -- smooth, lean muscles, and white.
It turns out that the Soloflex wasn't the game changer I envisioned at 15 years old. Even though I worked out religiously in my apartment gym, I never looked like Scott Madsen. But it did begin my life-long journey with fitness, which has lasted 30 years. The confidence I built using my Soloflex led me to the gym by my early thirties. At 35 years old, I became a certified personal trainer and achieved my peak level of fitness, even doing shirtless photo shoots and earning money off my body. I got distracted and left fitness for several years in my forties to focus on relationship and career. Then, at 50 years old, I found myself back in the gym, determined to reclaim the body I once had. At 55, I am lifting as heavy as I did at 35. My metabolism has slowed, though, and my eating habits need a makeover. And so my fitness quest continues, coupled with my journey toward body acceptance and confidence.
Looking back on the Soloflex with my "critically vigilant" lenses, I recognize how the models used to promote the product had body types that are not possible for many people. Women and men of color were added as models for Soloflex, but the lean muscled body type isn't one that we are all blessed with, or that we can even achieve. I also recognize, however, that advertising is a consumer-driven creator of fantasies, whether or not those fantasies are realistic.
I still struggle with body image, but I have the resources and knowledge to make the changes I want to see. And while the Soloflex is long gone, a corner of my apartment remains dedicated to fitness equipment and pictures of fitness models with impossible-to-achieve bodies.
Monday, November 19, 2018
Blog 3: Pop Culture Influences
Blog Posting Due: Monday, December 3 (Class Time).
Peer Responses (3) are also due by class time on December 3 , as you will need to enter your peers' names in your folders. This will be your last day of class.
For Blog 3, you will need to think and write about a cultural artifact that has personally impacted you in some significant way -- something that has been an important influence on your childhood or young adulthood, that helped shape who you are, what you value, and/or how you see and navigate the world. What were the messages that this artifact conveyed to you at the time? How did consuming this artifact make you feel? If you look back on this cultural artifact using your "critically vigilant" lenses (or, in the language of feminist cultural critic bell hooks, as an "enlightened witness"), do you see this artifact differently? If so, how? If not, why not?
This blog is not as prescriptive in that I am not requiring you to answer specific prompts, with each assigned a particular point value. However, you do need to choose something that you can write 300-400 words about (at least two-thirds of a single-spaced page). To receive full credit for Blog 3, you must also include images of or a hyperlink to your cultural artifact.
As an example, I will post a response to Blog 3 this week.
Monday, October 22, 2018
Blog 2: Gender in Specific Contexts
Blog Posting Due: Sunday, October 28 (Extended Deadline). Answer both prompts, and meet the general requirements, to receive full credit. Do not rewrite the prompts.
General Requirements: Posting is a minimum of 400 words. Your first and last names appear on your blog. Blog title includes “Blog 2” – You may add additional text to the title if you wish to be creative. Writing is clear, organized, and free of substantive grammatical errors. Identify each prompt clearly in your blog.
Prompt 1 –
Identify a cultural artifact that shows gender representations in one of the following contexts: Sports/Fitness, Music Videos, Television Shows, or Movies. Describe your cultural artifact. Post an image, or provide a link to the cultural artifact. If you choose a television show, you may not be able to link to the show itself, in which case you should post an image from the show. Why did you choose this particular example? (5 points)
Prompt 2 – Analyze. Consider the cultural diamond as a starting point to begin your analysis. Then, review and incorporate the 5 key questions in the MediaLitKit to analyze your cultural artifact.
In your analysis, include at least 2-3 sentences related to each of the 5 key questions related to Authorship, Format, Audience, Content, and Purpose. The guiding questions within each section will serve as considerations / resource in your analysis, but you do not need to answer all of the guiding questions within in each section. You must, however, address each of the 5 key questions. (10 points)
In your analysis, include at least 2-3 sentences related to each of the 5 key questions related to Authorship, Format, Audience, Content, and Purpose. The guiding questions within each section will serve as considerations / resource in your analysis, but you do not need to answer all of the guiding questions within in each section. You must, however, address each of the 5 key questions. (10 points)
Total Possible Points = 15 points
Monday, September 24, 2018
Blog 1: Gender
Blog Posting Due:
Saturday, September 22. Answer all four prompts, and meet the general
requirements, to receive full credit.
Prompt 1: Identify a
cultural artifact that is a representation of gender – that is, what it means
to be a woman, man, a transgender individual, or a person who exists outside of
the gender binary. Describe your
cultural artifact. Post an image, or
provide a link to the cultural artifact.
(3 points)
General
Requirements: Posting is a minimum
of 400 words. Your first and last names
appear on your blog. Blog title includes
“Blog 1” – You may add additional
text to the title if you wish to be creative. Writing is clear,
organized, and free of substantive grammatical errors. (3 points)
Total Possible Points = 15 points
Total Possible Points = 15 points
Peer Responses Due:
Sunday, September 30: 3 peer responses x 5
points each. Peer must be substantive in nature to receive full credit.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


